The objective of this article is to provide a thorough examination of the current state of haptic information feedback in minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including research conducted between 1985 and the present. Despite the fact that haptic information input in MIS is currently scarce, the comprehensive analysis emphasises that it represents a potential option. Surgeons might potentially get substantial benefits from receiving more input about force information, which would therefore enhance their surgical accuracy and control. The extant literature highlights a significant knowledge deficit regarding the intricate ramifications of haptic feedback, specifically with regard to the sense of slip and gripping forces. It is crucial to investigate the possible advantages of incorporating supplementary haptic information in order to protect against tissue damage when performing manipulation treatments. It is of the utmost importance to fill this void, since doing so might revolutionise the field of MIS via the mitigation of unintended tissue injury and the improvement of surgical results. By capitalising on technology progress to provide more extensive haptic feedback, surgeons have the ability to enhance their tactile perception, optimise the application of force, and reduce the likelihood of tissue injuries when performing complex surgical procedures.
laparoscopy, tactile perception, force feedback
Acosta, E., & Temkin, B. (2005). Haptic Laparoscopic Skills Trainer with Practical User Evaluation Metrics. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 111, 8–11.
Aggarwal, R., Mytton, O. T., Derbrew, M., et al. (2010). Training and simulation for patient safety. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 19, i34–i43. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2009.038562
Bala´zs, M., Feussner, H., Hirzinger, G., Omote, K., et al. (1998). Replacing Mechanical Joints in Laparoscopic Forceps with Elastic Beams for Improved Pressure Control and Sensitivity: A New Tool for Minor-Access Surgery. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 17, 45–48.
Barbagli, F., & Salisbury, K. (2003). The Effect of Sensor/Actuator Asymmetries in Haptic Interfaces. Proceedings – 11th Symp Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 140–147.
Basdogan, C., De, S., Kim, J., Muniyandi, M., Kim, H., et al. (2004). Haptics in Minimally Invasive Surgical Simulation and Training. Proceedings – Haptic Rendering – Beyond Visual Computing, IEEE Computer Society.
Breda, A., Territo, A., Moglia, A., et al. (2016). Platinum priority review-education a systematic review of virtual reality simulators for robot-assisted surgery. European Urology, 69, 1065–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021
Brouwer, I., Ustin, J., Bentley, L., Sherman, A., et al. (2001). Measuring in Vivo Animal Soft Tissue Properties for Haptic Modeling in Surgical Simulation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 81, 69–74.
Cao, C. G. L., Zhou, M., Jones, D. B., Schwaitzberg, S. D. (2007). Can surgeons think and operate with haptics at the same time? Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 11, 1564–1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0279-8
Carter, F. J., Frank, T. G., Davies, P. J., McLean, D., et al. (2001). Measurements and Modeling of the Compliance of Human and Porcine Organs. Medical Image Analysis, 5, 231–236.
Carter, T. J., Sermesant, M., Cash, D. M., Barratt, D. C., et al. (2005). Application of Soft Tissue Modeling to Image-Guided Surgery. Medical Engineering and Physics, 27, 893–909.
Cavusoglu, M. C., & Tendick, F. (2000). Multirate Simulation for High Fidelity Haptic Interaction with Deformable Objects in Virtual Environments. Proceedings – IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation [ICRA 2000], 2458–2465.
Chmarra, M. K., Dankelman, J., Van Den Dobbelsteen, J. J., & Jansen, F. W. (2008). Force feedback and basic laparoscopic skills. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 22, 2140–2148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9937-5
Chou, W., & Wang, T. (2001). The Design of Multimodal HumanMachine Interface for Teleoperation. Proceedings – IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 3187–3192.
Coles, T. R., Meglan, D., John, N. W. (2011). The role of haptics in medical training simulators: a survey of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 4, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2010.19
Cook, D. A., Hatala, R., Brydges, R., et al. (2011). Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education. JAMA, 306, 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1234
Culbertson, H., Schorr, S. B., Okamura, A. M. (2018). Haptics: the present and future of artificial touch sensation. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 1, 385–409. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-060117-105043
Dawe, S. R., Windsor, J. A., Broeders, J. A. J. L., Cregan, P. C., Hewett, P. J., Maddern, G. J. (2014). A systematic review of surgical skills transfer after simulation-based training. Annals of Surgery, 259, 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000245
Famaey, N., & Vander Sloten, J. (2008). Soft tissue modelling for applications in virtual surgery and surgical robotics. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 11, 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255840802020412
Flesher, S. N., Collinger, J. L., Foldes, S. T., et al. (2016). Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex. Science Translational Medicine, 8. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8083. 361ra141.
Fried, G. M. (2008). FLS assessment of competency using simulated laparoscopic tasks. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 12, 210–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0355-0
Hagelsteen, K., Langegard, A., Lantz, A., Ekelund, M., Anderberg, M., & Bergenfelz, A. (2017). Faster acquisition of laparoscopic skills in virtual reality with haptic feedback and 3D vision. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 26, 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2017.1305970
Halstead, W. S. (1904). The training of the surgeon. Bulletin of Johns Hopkins Hospital, 15, 267–275.
Heijnsdijk, E. A. M., Dankelman, J., & Gouma, D. J. (2002). Effectiveness of grasping and duration of clamping using laparoscopic graspers. Surgical Endoscopy, 16, 1329–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9179-2.
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., et al. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ, 343, d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.D5928
Houtsma, A., & Keuning, H. (2006). Can Augmented Force Feedback Facilitate Virtual Target Acquisition Tasks? Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 119, 207–212.
Jacobs, S., Holzhey, D., Strauss, G., Burgert, O., & Falk, V. (2007). The impact of haptic learning in telemanipulator-assisted surgery. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 17, 402–406. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e3180f60c23
Jayne, D., Pigazzi, A., Marshall, H., et al. (2017). Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer. JAMA, 318, 1569. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7219.
Jeong, I. G., Khandwala, Y. S., Kim, J. H., et al. (2017). Association of robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with perioperative outcomes and health care costs, 2003 to 2015. JAMA, 318, 1561. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.14586
Kitagawa, M., Dokko, D., Okamura, A. M., & Yuh, D. D. (2005). Effect of Sensory Substitution on Suture-Manipulation Forces for Robotic Surgical Systems. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 129, 151–158.
Kockerling, F. (2014). Robotic vs. standard laparoscopic technique - what is better? Frontiers in Surgery, 1, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2014.00015
Kretschmer, A., Grimm, T., Buchner, A., et al. (2017). Prospective evaluation of health-related quality of life after radical cystectomy: focus on peri- and postoperative complications. World Journal of Urology, 35, 1223–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1992-2
Lamata, P., Gomez, E. J., Bello, F., Kneebone, R. L., Aggarwal, R., & Lamata, F. (n.d.). Conceptual framework for laparoscopic VR simulators. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 26, 69–79. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17120915 [Accessed September 25, 2018]
Lessard, J., Robert, J.-M., & Rondot, P. (1995). Evaluaton of Working Techniques Using Teleoperation for Power Line Maintenance. Proceedings – SPIE – The International Society for Optical Engineering, 88–98.
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6, e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
Minogue, J., Jones, M. G. (2006). Haptics in education: exploring an untapped sensory modality. Review of Educational Research, 76, 317–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076003317.
Niitsu, H., Hirabayashi, N., Yoshimitsu, M., et al. (2013). Using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills [OSATS] global rating scale to evaluate the skills of surgical trainees in the operating room. Surgery Today, 43, 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0313-7
Oakley, I., McGee, M. R., Brewster, S., & Gray, P. (2000). Putting the Feel in ‘Look and Feel’. Proceedings – Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2000, 415–422.
Ottensmeyer, M. P., Ben-Ur, E., & Salisbury, J. K. (2000). Input and Output for Surgical Simulation: Devices to Measure Tissue Properties in Vivo and a Haptic Interface for Laparoscopy Simulators. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 70, 236–242.
Panait, L., Akkary, E., Bell, R. L., Roberts, K. E., Dudrick, S. J., & Duffy, A. J. (2009). The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. Journal of Surgical Research, 156, 312–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.018
Rodrigues, S. P., Horeman, T., Sam, P., et al. (2014). Influence of visual force feedback on tissue handling in minimally invasive surgery. British Journal of Surgery, 101, 1766–1773. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9669
Salkini, M. W., Doarn, C. R., Kiehl, N., Broderick, T. J., Donovan, J. F., Gaitonde, K. (2010). The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic training using the LapMentor II. Journal of Endourology, 24, 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0307
Schijven, M., & Jakimowicz, J. (2003). Virtual Reality Surgical Laparoscopic Simulators. Surgical Endoscopy, 17, 1943–1950.
Scott, I. A. (2009). Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies. BMJ, 338, b1860. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.B1860
Sim, H. G., Yip, S. K., & Cheng, C. W. (2006). Equipment and Technology in Surgical Robotics. World Journal of Urology, 24, 128–135.
Strom, P., Hedman, L., Sarna, L. S., Kjellin, A., Wredmark, T., & Felländer-Tsai, L. (2006). Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 20, 1383–1388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0545-3
Ström, P., Hedman, L., Sarna, L., Kjellin, A., et al. (2006). Early Exposure to Haptic Feedback Enhances Performance in Surgical Simulator Training: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study in Surgical Residents. Surgical Endoscopy, 20, 1383–1388.
Thompson, J. R., Leonard, A. C., Doarn, C. R., Roesch, M. J., Broderick, T. J. (2011). Limited value of haptics in virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training. Surgical Endoscopy, 25, 1107–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1325-2.Kim HK, Rattner DW, Srinivasan MA. Virtual-realitybased laparoscopic surgical training: the role of simulation fidelity in haptic feedback. Comput Aided Surg. 2004;9:227–234. https://doi.org/10.3109/ 10929080500066997.
Van Bruwaene, S., De Win, G., Miserez, M. (2009). How much do we need experts during laparoscopic suturing training? Surgical Endoscopy, 23, 2755–2761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0498-z
van der Meijden, O. A. J., & Schijven, M. P. (2009). The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review. Surgical Endoscopy, 23, 1180–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0298-x
van der Meijden, O. A. J., & Schijven, M. P. (2009). The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review. Surgical Endoscopy, 23, 1180–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0298-x
Vapenstad, C., Hofstad, E. F., Langø, T., Marvik, R., & Chmarra, M. K. (2013). Perceiving haptic feedback in virtual reality simulators. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 27, 2391–2397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2745-y
Wagner, C. R., & Howe, R. D. (2005). Mechanisms of Performance Enhancement with Force Feedback. First Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 21–29.
Waurick, R., Weber, T., Broking, K., Van Aken, H. (2007). The European working time directive: effect on education and clinical care. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 20, 576–579. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0-b013e3282f0ef61
Yiannakopoulou, E., Nikiteas, N., Perrea, D., Tsigris, C. (2015). Virtual reality simulators and training in laparoscopic surgery. International Journal of Surgery, 13, 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.014
Zhou, M., Tse, S., Derevianko, A., Jones, D. B., Schwaitzberg, S. D., & Cao, C. G. L. (2012). Effect of haptic feedback in laparoscopic surgery skill acquisition. Surgical Endoscopy, 26, 1128–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2011-8
