Background: To compare the effectiveness of Advanced Vision Therapy (AVT) versus Conventional Vision Therapy (CVT) in amblyopia, convergence insufficiency (CI), and accommodative dysfunction (AD).
Methods: In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 90 patients aged 6–30 years with amblyopia (n = 30), CI (n = 30), or AD (n = 30) were randomized equally to AVT or CVT. Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, LogMAR), near point of convergence (NPC, cm), positive fusional vergence (PFV, Δ), amplitude of accommodation (AA, D), accommodative facility (AF, cycles/min), and near point of accommodation (NPA, cm). Secondary outcome was symptom burden (CISS score). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 months.
Results: AVT improved amblyopia (BCVA) more than CVT, with a mean difference of -0.19 LogMAR at 6 months (95% CI -0.22 to -0.17; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 2.84). AVT increased PFV by +2.6Δ (95% CI 1.90 to 3.30; p < 0.001; d = 1.77) and decreased NPC by -3.7 cm (95% CI -4.18 to -3.22; p < 0.001; d = 4.03), indicating convergence insufficiency. Accommodative dysfunction (NPA, AA, AF): AF increased by +2.6 cycles/min (95% CI 1.83 to 3.37; p < 0.001; d = 1.78), whereas AA changes were negligible and did not statistically differ across groups. NPA improved by –3.2 cm (95% CI –3.63 to –2.77; p < 0.001; d = 3.81). Symptoms (CISS): 82% of AVT patients achieved asymptomatic state, compared to 48% in CVT, and AVT decreased ratings by -5.2 points as compared to CVT (95% CI –6.58 to –3.82; p < 0.001; d = 2.00).
Conclusions: When compared to the traditional method, advanced vision therapy showed more rapid and noticeable enhancements in visual acuity, convergence, accommodation, and symptom reduction. According to these findings, AVT is a useful and successful treatment for common binocular vision problems.
Amblyopia, convergence insufficiency, accommodative dysfunction, binocular vision, advanced vision therapy, vision rehabilitation
Arvind, H., Klistorner, A., Graham, S. L., & Grigg, J. R. (2006). Multifocal visual evoked responses to dichoptic stimulation using virtual reality goggles. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 112(3), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-006-0005-y
Birch, E. E., Kelly, K. R., & Wang, J. (2021). Recent advances in screening and treatment for amblyopia. Ophthalmology and Therapy, 10(4), 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-021-00394-7
Candy, T. R., & Cormack, L. K. (2022). Recent understanding of binocular vision in the natural environment with clinical implications. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 88, 101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101014
Chen, A. M., & Cotter, S. A. (2016). The amblyopia treatment studies: Implications for clinical practice. Advances in Ophthalmology and Optometry, 1(1), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yaoo.2016.03.007
Chen, C. W., Zhu, Q., Duan, Y. B., & Yao, J. Y. (2021). Comparison between binocular therapy and patching for treatment of amblyopia: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open Ophthalmology, 6(1), e000625. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000625
Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial (CITT) Study Group. (2008). The Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial: Design, methods, and baseline data. Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 15(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09286580701772037
Hashemi, H., Pakzad, R., Yekta, A., Bostamzad, P., Aghamirsalim, M., Sardari, S., Valadkhan, M., Pakbin, M., Heydarian, S., & Khabazkhoob, M. (2018). Global and regional estimates of prevalence of amblyopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Strabismus, 26(4), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2018.1500618
Hilora, M., & Tripathy, K. (2025). Accommodative excess. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK592379/
Hu, B., Liu, Z., Zhao, J., Zeng, L., Hao, G., Shui, D., & Mao, K. (2022). The global prevalence of amblyopia in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 10, 819998. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.819998
Leal Vega, L., Piñero, D. P., Hernández Rodríguez, C. J., & colleagues. (2022). Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of the NEIVATECH virtual reality system to improve visual function in children with anisometropic amblyopia. BMC Ophthalmology, 22, 253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02466-z
Mussa, R. F., Abdullah, W. H., & Mahdi, A. H. (2025). The impact of electronic digital device use on vision in children. Medical Journal of Babylon, 22(1), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.4103/MJBL.MJBL_952_23
Niechwiej-Szwedo, E., Colpa, L., & Wong, A. (2023). The role of binocular vision in the control and development of visually guided upper limb movements. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 378(1869), 20210461. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0461
Presta, V., Guarnieri, A., Laurenti, F., Mazzei, S., Arcari, M. L., Mirandola, P., Vitale, M., Chia, M. Y. H., Condello, G., & Gobbi, G. (2024). The impact of digital devices on children's health: A systematic literature review. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 9(4), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9040236
Qiu, X., Zhou, Y., Yu, X., Wang, Z., Shen, T., Deng, D., Chen, J., Lin, X., Wu, H., Kang, Y., Ye, Q., Chen, Q., Yan, J., & Li, J. (2024). Impact of online video game-based dichoptic training on binocular vision rehabilitation in post-surgical patients with intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology and Therapy, 13(8), 2185–2196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-024-00978-z
Scheiman, M., Cotter, S., Kulp, M. T., Mitchell, G. L., Cooper, J., Gallaway, M., Hopkins, K. B., Bartuccio, M., Chung, I., & Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial Study Group. (2011). Treatment of accommodative dysfunction in children: Results from a randomized clinical trial. Optometry and Vision Science, 88(11), 1343–1352. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31822f4d7c
Sverdlichenko, I., Mandelcorn, M. S., Issashar Leibovitzh, G., Mandelcorn, E. D., Markowitz, S. N., & Tarita-Nistor, L. (2022). Binocular visual function and fixational control in patients with macular disease: A review. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 42(2), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12925
Tsang, S. M. H., Cheing, G. L. Y., Lam, A. K. C., Siu, A. M. H., Pang, P. C. K., Yip, K. C., Chan, J. W. K., & Jensen, M. P. (2023). Excessive use of electronic devices among children and adolescents is associated with musculoskeletal symptoms, visual symptoms, psychosocial health, and quality of life: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1178769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1178769
Varshney, A., Singal, G., & Thakor, S. (2025a). Structured vision therapy for refractive anisometropic amblyopia in a pediatric patient: A detailed case report aligned with international clinical guidelines. The Explorers, 1(2), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15659025
Varshney, A., & Singal, G. (2025b). Visual rehabilitation using contact lens–assisted vision therapy in adolescent anisometropic amblyopia with exotropia: A 24-week case report. The Explorers, 1(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16729065
