Journal of Medical Surgical and Allied Sciences, Volume 2, Issue 2 : 7-11. Doi : 10.37446/jmedsurg/cr/2.2.2024.7-11
Case Report

OPEN ACCESS | Published on : 31-Dec-2024

NRBCs associated leukopenia: alternative formula for correction of leukocytes count: a case study

  • Mustafa Ibrahim Abbas
  • Department of Hematology and Immunohematology, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Sciences, University of Gezira, Wad Medani, Sudan.
  • Khalid Abdelsamea Mohamedahmed
  • Department of Hematology and Immunohematology, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Sciences, University of Gezira, Wad Medani, Sudan.; Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jerash University, Jerash, Jordan. khalid.gu89@gmail.com. ORCID No: 0000-0001-7084-6106.
  • Mai Shakir Haridy
  • Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jerash University, Jerash, Jordan.

Abstract

Background: White blood count is considered one of the important inflammatory markers, and its age and gender dependent, under unusual pathological conditions, which can lead to false elevation in TWBCs and should be corrected. Rare cases associated with severe hemolytic anemia and severe leukopenia have potential limitation when corrected using conventional formula.

Case presentation: A case report of 4 years old Sudanese boy patient who was hospitalized with sickle cell disease (SCD). Complete blood count (CBC) parameters were analyzed using 3PD Automated Hematology Analyzer. Peripheral blood picture (PBP) was prepared and stained using leishmen's stain. The data calculate using alternative formula as following. Corrected TWBCs = {mean white blood cells (HPF)/ mean NRBCs (HPF)} × TWBCs. The laboratory findings revealed TWBCs: 124×103/μL, PBP show one WBCs among each 30 NRBCs in ratio of 0.033, the corrected TWBCs: 4.09×103/μL. NRBCs: 119.9×103/μL.

Conclusion: The presence of NRBCs on ratio more than 1:1 NRBCs to WBCs must be calculated using an alternative formula for calculation of NRBCs and corrected TWBCs specially in cases of severe hemolytic anemia and megaloblastic anemia.

Keywords

corrected TWBCs, NRBCs, alternative formula

References

  • Abboud, M. R. (2020). Standard management of sickle cell disease complications. Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy, 13(2), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hemonc.2019.12.007

    Bain, B. J. (2015). Blood cells: A practical guide (5th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

    Ballas, S. K. (2018). Sickle cell disease: Classification of clinical complications and approaches to preventive and therapeutic management. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, 68(2–3), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-189002

    Buttarello, M. (2004). Quality specification in haematology: the automated blood cell count. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 346(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cccn.2004.02.038

    Buttarello, M. (2016). Laboratory diagnosis of anemia: Are the old and new red cell parameters useful in classification and treatment, how? International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, 38 (Suppl 1), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12500

    Carden, M. A., & Little, J. (2019). Emerging disease-modifying therapies for sickle cell disease. Haematologica, 104(9), 1710–1719. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.207357

    de Keijzer, M. H., & van der Meer, W. (2002). Automated counting of nucleated red blood cells in blood samples of newborns. Clinical Laboratory Haematology, 24(6), 343–345. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2257.2002.00477.x

    Hoffbrand, A. V., & Steensma, D. P. (2019). Hoffbrand’s essential haematology (8th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

    Kuert, S., Holland-Letz, T., Friese, J., & Stachon, A. (2011). Association of nucleated red blood cells in blood and arterial oxygen partial tension. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 49(2), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.041

    McPherson, R. A., & Pincus, M. R. (Eds.). (2016). Henry’s clinical diagnosis and management by laboratory methods (23rd ed.). Elsevier.

    Novis, D. A., Walsh, M., Wilkinson, D., St Louis, M., & Ben-Ezra, J. (2006). Laboratory productivity and the rate of manual peripheral blood smear review: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 95,141 complete blood count determinations performed in 263 institutions. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 130(5), 596–601. https://doi.org/10.5858/2006-130-596-LPATRO