Submission Guidelines (View the Scope)
Submission of Manuscript: Authors are requested to submit their manuscripts only online (currently using email). Only papers of high scientific quality will be accepted for publication. The manuscript will be analyzed for plagiarism with Turnitin before acceptance for the review process. Acceptance of papers is the sole discretion of the Editor based on the recommendations from the Chief Editor, editorial board members, and additional reviewers. Manuscripts submitted will be subjected to peer review by two reviewers familiar with the relevant field of research, being from a different country or at least from another institution from the author. Authors may suggest names and addresses of two experts who, in their opinion, can review the paper. The choice of referees will, however, remain with the editorial board. After the review process, the Editor will inform the about the acceptance, rejection, or necessity of revision of the manuscript to the corresponding author.
Manuscript types:
Format of Manuscript: All manuscripts must be written in English and typed double-spaced with a 2.5 cm margin on all sides.
Submission Process, email us: cornoupublications@gmail.com
Research Articles and Research Notes:
The paper must be arranged in the following order with all pages with line numbers in a single word document:-
Title (Separate Page): The title page should contain the following details
Title of the article (maximum of 90 characters)
Name in full form of the author(s) (first name and last name)
Affiliation(s) of author(s) with full address including mail ID(s)
Contributions of the author(s) for the manuscript
Abstract must be compact and concise and written with up to 300 words highlighting the Background, Methods, Results, and Conclusion of the manuscript
Keywords: 5-6 keywords should be given for easy indexing of the article.
Introduction should review the relevant knowledge of the subject and with a concise statement of the objectives of the study.
Materials and Methods should include brief technical descriptions of the methodology adopted with proper citation, while a detailed description is required if the methods are new.
Results should contain observations on the experiment illustrated by tables and figures. Using a well-known statistical test, obscure and poor statistical methods might be liable for rejection.
Discussion must not recapitulate results but should relate the author's experiments to other work on the subject and give their conclusions.
Conclusions should summarize the central state of these findings, implications for further research, recommendations, and limitations.
Acknowledgments: If any, should be brief and given only for specific guidance, assistance, financial grants, etc., not for routine facilities.
Author contributions: This part should contain information about how the authors in which aspect they contributed to the development of the data and manuscript.
AI Tool Usage Declaration: The authors should declare that no AI and associated tools are used for writing scientific content in the article
References: Standard APA style.
Review Articles
Review articles are a great way to bring together existing research on a particular topic. They come in various formats, each with its own unique structure.
a. Systematic Reviews:
Title Page: Should be clear and informative, including the authors' affiliations.
Abstract: This should be structured (think Background, Objectives, Data Sources, Study Eligibility, Data Extraction and Synthesis, Results, Conclusions) and typically ranges from 250 to 300 words.
Keywords: Include 3 to 5 relevant keywords.
Introduction: Offer some background on the topic, explain why the review is necessary, and clearly state the research question(s) (using the PICO format is recommended for clinical topics).
Methods: Provide a detailed account of your search strategy (including databases, keywords, and filters), criteria for selecting studies (inclusion/exclusion), how you extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and the methods used for data synthesis (like qualitative synthesis or meta-analysis). Following PRISMA guidelines is highly encouraged.
Results: Present the search results (using a PRISMA flow diagram), describe the characteristics of the included studies, share findings from the risk of bias assessment, and summarize the synthesized evidence clearly.
Discussion: Interpret the findings, discuss the limitations of the review, consider implications for practice or future research, and draw overall conclusions.
Conclusion: Offer a brief recap of the main findings.
References: Include a comprehensive list of all works cited.
Appendices (Optional): You can add search strategies, data extraction forms, and risk of bias tools.
Word Limit (excluding abstract, references, tables, and figures): Aim for 5,000 to 8,000 words.
Figures/Tables: You can include up to 8.
b. Meta-Analyses:
Title Page: Should be concise and informative.
Abstract: An unstructured summary that captures the scope, key findings, and conclusions (200-250 words).
Keywords: Include 3-5 relevant keywords.
Introduction: Provides background on the topic, the rationale for the review, and outlines what the review will cover.
Methods: A thorough explanation of the statistical techniques used in the meta-analysis, such as fixed-effect and random-effect models, assessing heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and evaluating publication bias.
Results: This section showcases forest plots, funnel plots (if relevant), heterogeneity statistics, and pooled effect estimates along with their confidence intervals.
Word Limit (excluding abstract, references, tables, and figures): 5,000-8,000 words.
Figures/Tables: You can include up to 10, which can feature forest plots and funnel plots.
c. Comprehensive Narrative Reviews:
Title Page: Should be concise and informative.
Abstract: An unstructured summary that captures the scope, key findings, and conclusions (200-250 words).
Keywords: Include 3-5 relevant keywords.
Introduction: Provides background on the topic, the rationale for the review, and outlines what the review will cover.
Thematic Sections: Organized by sub-topics, arguments, or the chronological development of the field, with clear headings for each section.
Discussion: This part synthesizes key themes, critically evaluates the literature, identifies controversies or unanswered questions, and offers suggestions for future research.
Conclusion: A brief recap of the main insights.
References: A thorough list of all works cited.
Word Limit (excluding abstract, references, tables, and figures): 4,000-7,000 words.
Figures/Tables: Up to 6.
Short Communications
Title Page: Should be brief and informative.
Abstract: An unstructured summary that encapsulates the research question, methods, key results, and conclusion (150-200 words).
Keywords: Include 3-5 relevant keywords.
Introduction: A short background followed by a clear statement of the research objective.
Materials and Methods: Provide enough detail for others to replicate the study.
Results: Present findings clearly and concisely, ideally with minimal use of figures and tables.
Discussion: Offer an interpretation of the results, their importance, and a brief comparison with existing literature. Avoid lengthy reviews.
Conclusion: A succinct summary of the main finding.
References: A focused list of essential citations.
Word Limit (excluding abstract, references, tables, and figures): 1,500-2,500 words.
Figures/Tables: Limit to 2-3.
Case Reports
Title Page: Should be clear and descriptive, highlighting the patient's condition or treatment.
Abstract: An unstructured summary that encapsulates the background, case details, and key insights (100-150 words).
Keywords: 3-5 relevant keywords.
Introduction: A brief overview of the condition or the significance of the case.
Case Presentation: A thorough chronological account of the patient's history, symptoms, physical examination findings, diagnostic tests, differential diagnoses, treatment, and outcomes. It's crucial to maintain patient anonymity.
Discussion: An analysis of the case within the context of existing literature, emphasizing its uniqueness, lessons learned, and implications for clinical practice or research.
Conclusion: A concise summary of the case's importance.
Patient Consent: A statement confirming that informed consent was obtained from the patient (or guardian) for publication.
References: Relevant citations.
Word Limit (excluding abstract, references, tables, and figures): 1,000-2,000 words.
Figures/Tables: Up to 3 (e.g., clinical images, lab results, timelines). Ensure that patient privacy is preserved in all images.
Methodology Papers
Title Page: Should be clear and descriptive of the new method.
Abstract: This can be structured or unstructured, summarizing the problem being tackled, the new method, its benefits, and possible applications (200-250 words).
Keywords: Include 3-5 relevant keywords.
Introduction: Provide background on the current challenges or limitations that the new method aims to address, along with a clear statement of the paper's objective.
Theoretical Background/Principle: Offer a detailed explanation of the fundamental principles behind the new method.
Method Description: Give a thorough, step-by-step account of the new method, including any necessary materials, equipment, software, or algorithms. Flowcharts, diagrams, or pseudocode can be incredibly helpful here.
Validation/Application (if applicable): Show how effective, accurate, or useful the method is through examples, experimental validation, or comparisons with existing methods.
Discussion: Provide a critical evaluation of the method's strengths, weaknesses, generalizability, and potential impact.
Conclusion: Wrap up with a summary of the new method and its importance.
Availability: Share information on how to access the method/software (e.g., code repositories, datasets).
References: Include relevant citations.
Word Limit (excluding abstract, references, tables, and figures): 3,000-5,000 words.
Figures/Tables: You can include up to 5-7 (like diagrams, flowcharts, example outputs, validation plots).
Commentaries/Editorials
Title Page: Keep it concise and engaging.
Abstract (Brief): A very short summary that may not be required by some journals. If you choose to include it, aim for 50-100 words.
Keywords: 3-5 relevant terms.
Introduction: Set the stage briefly for the topic or article at hand.
Main Body: This is where you develop your argument, perspective, or analysis. Feel free to use subheadings if your piece is lengthy. Make sure to back up your claims with solid evidence or logical reasoning.
Conclusion: Wrap up by summarizing your main points and offering a forward-looking perspective, including implications or recommendations.
References: Provide a concise list of highly relevant citations.
Word Limit (excluding abstract and references): Aim for 800-1,500 words.
Figures/Tables: These are rarely included; only one figure or table is allowed if it's absolutely necessary to illustrate a point.
Journals (standard APA format)
Abusaleha, A., & Shanmugavelu, K. G. (1988). Studies on the effect of organic versus inorganic sources of nitrogen on growth, yield and quality of okra. Indian Journal of Horticulture , 45, 312-318.
Batra, V. K., Dhankhar, S. K., Bhatia, A. K., Virender, S., Arora, S. K., & Singh, V. P. (2006). Response of brinjal to foliar feeding of water soluble fertilizers. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 35(3/4).
Books
Personal author(s)
Jackson, L. M. (2019). The psychology of prejudice: From attitudes to social action (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000168-000
Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: The biology of humans at our best and worst. Penguin Books.
Edited book
Kesharwani, P. (Ed.). (2020). Nanotechnology based approaches for tuberculosis treatment. Academic Press.
Torino, G. C., Rivera, D. P., Capodilupo, C. M., Nadal, K. L., & Sue, D. W. (Eds.). (2019). Microaggression theory: Influence and implications. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119466642
Chapter in a book
Author, A. A. (Year). Title of chapter. In B. B. Editor (Ed.), Title of book (pp. xxx–xxx). Location: Publisher..
Published proceedings paper
Duckworth, A. L., Quirk, A., Gallop, R., Hoyle, R. H., Kelly, D. R., & Matthews, M. D. (2019). Cognitive and noncognitive predictors of success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 116(47), 23499–23504. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910510116
Dissertation or thesis
Knight, A. (2001). Exercise and osteoarthritis of the knee (Unpublished master's dissertation). Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Tables and figures: The table should be descriptive without references to the text with a heading in bold letters. Tables, figures, and drawings should be placed inside the text in the appropriate position in the article. Figures whether the line drawing or graph should be of good quality. Legends to figures should be given on a separate sheet. Tables and figures should be numbered in Arabic numerals (Table 1., Table 2. and Figures 1., Figures 2.).
Photographs
The photographs should be of good quality (not less than 300 dpi resolution, to occupy a text column width of 8 cm they must have at least 1000 pixels width.) and provided in the JPEG/TIFF format. Please send original (not resized) photograph(s), straight from a digital camera, without any text descriptions on the photo. Standard abbreviations and units should be used. SI units are recommended. Abbreviations should be defined at first appearance and their use in the title and abstract should be avoided. Generic names of chemicals should be used. Genus and species names should be typed in italics. Subheadings should not be in italics.
Submission checklist: Ensure that the following items are present before sending the manuscript to the journal for review.
Proofs and Reprints: Page proofs (PDF) will be sent by email to the corresponding author. The corrected proofs should be returned to the Editor within 5 days of receipt. The delay in sending the proofs may shift the paper to the next issue. Correspondence through email will only be entertained. Page proofs are considered to be the final version of the manuscript. Except for typographical or minor clerical errors, no changes will be made in the manuscript at the proof stage. To minimize the corrections and alterations in the proof stage, authors are requested to prepare the manuscript carefully according to journal format before submitting it for publication. PDF of the published papers will be provided to the author via email. Authors can freely download PDF file from which they can print unlimited copies of their articles. The author must mention his/her email ID.
Correspondence
Any correspondence regarding publication of papers should be sent to- The Editor-in-Chief, Cornous Biology, Email: cornouspublications@gmail.com
Copyright Policy for Submission
A statement must accompany each manuscript that it has been neither published nor submitted for publication, in whole or in part, either in a serial, professional journal or as a part in which is formally published and made available to the public. Without copyright declaration during the submission, the manuscript is not considered for processing.
Disclaimer
No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury or damage to persons or property as a matter of product liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. All experiments using animals should be done under the approval of an institutional animal experiment committee and this should be stated and documented in the text. Plagiarism is a serious issue and an awful practice in academic fraternity. The authors are requested to please adopt the holistic & pragmatic approach to design the manuscript of interest. Plagiarism will be considered as a crime and punishable under law.
