Journal of Innovative Agriculture, Volume 10, Issue 2 : 16-26. Doi : 10.37446/jinagri/rsa/10.2.2023.16-26
Research Article

OPEN ACCESS | Published on : 30-Jun-2023

Agricultural production and productivity constraints and opportunities in Dasenech and Nyagatom districts of South Omo Zone, Ethiopia

  • Asmera Adicha
  • Agricultural Economics and Gender Research Directorate, Jinka Agricultural Research Center, Jinka, Ethiopia.
  • Denbela Hidosa
  • Livestock Research Directorate, Jinka Agricultural Research Center, Jinka, Ethiopia.
  • Yibrah G/Meskel
  • Low land Livelihood Resilience Project, Jinka Coordination Office, Jinka Ethiopia.


The economy of the South Omo Zone heavily relies on livestock and crop production, but there are multiple challenges and constraints that are affecting these sectors. It is important to identify these issues at the grassroots level because the approach of delivering agricultural technologies from the top-down is not effective. This study was conducted to assess agricultural production and productivity constraints and opportunities in the Dasenech and Nyagatom districts of Ethiopia. To achieve the intended purpose, one Kebele was chosen from each district, and one pastoral and agro-pastoral research and extension group (PAPREG), which consisted of about 25 agro-pastoralists (15 males and ten females) was formed after conducting a community meeting. The existing crop varieties, productivity per hectare, prevailing agronomic practices, existing livestock breeds, livestock feed bases, animal husbandry system, agricultural technological demands and crop and livestock production constraints, and opportunities were important issues forwarded to PAPREG members. The results showed that a shortage of improved crop varieties and gasoline was ranked first and second in both districts, while drought was ranked third in Dasenech and sixth in Nyagatom district. Crop diseases and pests were ranked fifth in both districts, and a lack of awareness of improved agronomic practices was ranked third in Nyagatom and sixth in Dasench district. The agro-pastoralists in both districts were ranked feed shortages, animal disease and parasite prevalence, and limited access to veterinary services as first, second and third, respectively. In Dasench, the lack of improved breed and forage seeds was ranked fourth, while in Nyagatom, it was fifth. The Dasenech pastoralists strongly preferred cultivating improved Panicum grass, whereas the Nygatom preferred cultivating improved sorghum. The availability of fertile farmland and the sustainable Omo River present important opportunities for small-scale producers and investors. Based on the findings, efforts should be made to boost agricultural production and productivity by introducing improved crop and forage varieties, managing diseases and pests, improving indigenous breeds, strengthening veterinary drug supply services, developing improved forage banking systems, and providing capacity-building services.


agriculture, agro-pastoralists, production, productivity, constraints, opportunities


  • Abdissa, F., Tesema, G.& Yirga, C. (2017).  Impact Analysis of Small-Scale Irrigation Schemes on Household Food Security in the Case of Sibu Sire District in Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Irrigation Drainage Sys Eng, 6 (1), 187.

    Adicha, A., Alemayehu, Y & Darcho, D. (2022). Determinants of Adoption of Improved Panicum Forage by Agro- pastorals in Dasenech District, South Omo, Southern Ethiopia. J. Agric. Environ. Sci, 7(2), 9-25.

    Agricultural Transmission Agency. (2017). Ethiopian Agriculture and Strategies for Growth Presented to Ethiopia - Norway Agribusiness Seminar, November.

    Almekinders, SJM., & Elings, A. (2001). Collaboration of farmers and breeders: participatory crop improvement in perspective, 425 - 438.

    Adicha, A., Girma, M., Darcho, D., & Kuse, K. (2021). Value Chain Analysis of Goat in South Omo Zone, Ethiopia SNNPR, Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, 7(1), 907-919.

    Asmera, A., & Yidnekachew, A. (2021). Socioeconomic impact of small-scale irrigation on household’s livelihood improvement in Bena-Tsemay district of South Omo zone, Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation, and Technology, 11(2), 139-146.

    Tolera, B., & Hidosa, D. (2023). Cattle feed production constraint and opportunity in southwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Innovative Agriculture10(1), 12-25.

    Abebe, B. K., Alemayehu, M. T., & Haile, S. M. (2022). Opportunities and Challenges for Pastoral Beef Cattle Production in Ethiopia. Advances in Agriculture, 1-8, 2022.

    Central Statistical Agency (CSA) (2017).  Federal democratic republic of Ethiopia central statistical agency, agricultural sample survey 2017/18, Volume II, Report on livestock and livestock characteristics, Addis Ababa.

    Central Statistical Agency (CSA) (2021). Federal democratic republic of Ethiopia central statistical agency, agricultural sample survey. Population Size by Sex, Region, Zone and woreda: July 2021.

    Daniel T. (2008). Beef Cattle Production System and Opportunities for Market Orientation in Borena Zone, Southern Ethiopia. A thesis Submitted to the Department of Animal Science, School of Graduate Studies. Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

    Getaneh, D., Banerjee, S., & Taye, M. (2019). Husbandry and Breeding Practices of Malle Cattle Reared in Malle District South Omo Zone of Southwest Ethiopia, J. Anim. Vet. Adv.,18 (12): 323-338.

    Hidosa, D., Adicha, A., & Sultan, M. (2022). Production and commercialization status of improved panicum grass cultivation in the lowland livestock production system of South Omo South-Western Ethiopia. Research on World Agricultural Economy3(4), 694.

    Hidosa, D., Tesfaye, Y., & Feleke, A. (2017). Assessment on Feed Resource, Feed Production Constraints and Opportunities in Salamago Woreda in South Omo Zone, in South Western Ethiopia, Academic Journal of Nutrition, 6 (3), 34-42.

    Gezie, M., & Tejada Moral M. (2019). Farmer’s Response to Climate Change and Variability in Ethiopia: A Review. Cogent Food Agric. 5, 1613770.

    Denbela, H., & Yidinikachew, T. (2018). Assessment Study on Livestock Feed Resource, Feed Availability and Production Constraints in Maale Woreda in South Omo Zone. J Fisheries Livest Prod., 6 (2), 1-5.

    Hidosa, D., Adicha, A. & Sultan, M. (2022). Production and Commercialization Status of Improved Panicum Grass Cultivation in the Lowland Livestock Production System of South Omo Southwestern Ethiopia. Research on World Agricultural Economy, 3(4), 694.

    Mekuyie, M.  & Mulu, D. (2021). Perception of Impacts of Climate Variability on Pastoralists and Their Adaptation/Coping Strategies in Fentale District of Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Environ. Syst. Res., 10(4), 1-10.

    MoFED. (2016). Growth and Transformation Plan II (2015/16-2019/20). National Planning Commission, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

    Njeru, E., Grey S., & Kilawe, E. (2016). Eastern Africa Climate-Smart Agriculture Scoping Study: Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda; FAO: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2016.

    Ritchie, H. (2019). Which Countries Eat the Most Meat? BBC News. https://www.

    Salo, S., Tadesse, G., & Haylemeskel, D. (2017). Survey on Constraints of Improved Forage Adoption in Anelemo Woreda, Hadiya Zone, Ethiopia. Agric. Res. Tech. Open Access J, 12(1), 555-839.

    Shita, A., Kumar, N., & Singh, S. (2018). Agricultural technology adoption and its determinants in Ethiopia: A reviewed paper. Asia Pacific Journal of Research, 1 (55), 99–104.

    Terefe, E., Dessie, T., Haile, A., Mulatu, W., & Mwai, O. (2015). On-farm phenotypic characterization of Mursi cattle in its production environment in South Omo Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. Anim. Genet. Resource,  57(2), 15-24.

    Adane, Z., Yemane, N. & Hidosa, D. (2021). Cattle Production System and Breeding Practices in Bena-Tsemay District of South Omo, Southwestern Ethiopia. International Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences3(4), 142-159.

    Zerssa, G., Feyssa D., Kim D.-G., & Eichler-Löbermann B. (2022). Challenges of Smallholder Farming in Ethiopia and Opportunities by Adopting Climate-Smart Agriculture. Agriculture, 192(11), 1-25.