Journal of Innovative Agriculture, Volume 9, Issue 2 : 28-41. Doi : 10.37446/jinagri/rsa/9.2.2022.28-41
Research Article

OPEN ACCESS | Published on : 30-Jun-2022

Performance evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) varieties for growth and yield as influenced by Urea and NPK fertilizers

  • Musa Umar Tanko
  • Department of Crop Production, Prince Abubakar Audu University, PMB 1008 Anyigba, Kogi State, Nigeria.
  • Yusuf Momohjimoh
  • Department of Agricultural Technology, Kogi State Polytechnic, PMB 1101 Lokoja, Kogi State, Nigeria.


This field experiment was conducted during the 2021 cropping season at the Prince Abubakar Audu University Research and Demonstration farm, Anyigba in the Southern Guinea Savana Agro Ecological Zone of Nigeria to determine the performance of maize varieties under the influence of NPK 20:10:10 and Urea fertilizer application. A Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) was used with three replications. The treatment consisted of three NPK 20:10:10 levels (0, 60, 120), Urea (0, 60, 120) and two varieties [Samaz 52 (OPV) and Oba-super-6 (Hybrid)] respectively. Results obtained show that fertilizers application increased growth parameters such as; plant height, days to 1st and 50% flowering. However, Number of leaves/plant, number of spikes/plant and grain weight/cob was not significantly influenced by fertilizer application. There were varietal differences in number of spikes/tassel and threshing %. Oba-super-6 consistently produced taller plants, thicker stems, higher leaf area, more spike/tassels than OPV. Application of NPK 20:10:10 fertilizer at 120kg/ha significantly influence yield and some yield components such as cob length (13.84cm), threshing % (78.61) and final grain yield (4196.30kg/ha), number of grains/cob (355.85), leaf area at 4 and 6WAS (307.21 and 447.28cm) respectively than at the application of 60kg/ha and 0kg/ha. However, application of 120kg N/ha significantly influenced 100-seed weight (29.36). Oba-super-6 out yielded OPV in yield and its components. For the interactions studied, for days to emergence, all factors studied had no significant effect (P ≥ 0.05); for plant height, NPK x V, NPK x N, N x V was significant (P ≤ 0.05), for days to 1st, NPK x N and NPK x N x V was significant (P ≤ 0.05), for days to 50% flowering, NPK x V, N x V and NPK x N x V was significant (P ≤ 0.05). for threshing percent, only NPK x N was significant (P ≤ 0.05); for No. of grains/cob, NPK x N and NPK x N x V was significant (P ≤ 0.05); for 100-seed weight, all factors studied had no significant effect (P ≥ 0.05); for final grain weight, NPK x N and NPK x N x V was significant.


urea, threshing percent, Days to emergence, Final Grain weight, 100-seed weight, variety and interaction, maize


  • Adediran, J. A., & Banjoko, V. A. (1995). Response of maize to nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers in the savanna zones of Nigeria. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis26(3-4), 593-606.

    Agba, T. S., & Long, H. S. (2005). Nitrogen effects on maize foliage and grain yield. Nigerian Agricultural Journal3, 74-80.

    Agbede, T. M., Adekiya, A. O., Ale, M. O., Eifediyi, E. K., & Olatunji, C. A. (2019). Effects of green manures and NPK fertilizer on soil properties, tomato yield and quality in the forest-savanna ecology of Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture55(5), 793-806.

    Ahmadu, I. A. (2014). Performance of extra-early maize (Zea mays, L.) varieties as influenced by rate of nitrogen and intra-row spacing (Doctoral dissertation, M. Sc. Thesis, Fac. Agric., Ahmadu Bello Univ. Zaria, Nigeria).

    Akintoye, H. A., Kling, J. G., & Lucas, E. O. (1999). N-use efficiency of single, double and synthetic maize lines grown at four N levels in three ecological zones of West Africa. Field Crops Research60(3), 189-199.

    Ayub, M., Nadeem, M. A., Sharar, M. S., & Mahmood, N. (2002). Response of maize (Zea mays L.) fodder to different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences1(4), 352-354.

    Baba, I. S. (2002). Effect of plant density and rate of NPK fertilizer on the performance of popcorn (Zea mays everta). Unpublished B. Agric. Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria: 48

    Bashir, N., Malik, S. A., Mahmood, S., & Athar, M. (2012). Influence of urea application on growth, yield and mineral uptake in two corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology11(46), 10494-10503.

    Doebley, J. (2010). The Genetics of Maize Evolution. Ann. Rev. Genet. 38: pp3.

    FAOSTAT. (2011). Production-Crops 2010 Data 2011, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 2011,

    FAO. (2014). Production Year Book, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

    Gallais, A., & Hirel, B. (2014). An approach to the genetics of nitrogen use efficiency in maize. J. Exp. Bot., 55, 295 - 306.

    Hussaini, M. A., Ogunlela, V. B., Ramalan, A. A., & Falaki, A. M. (2001). Growth and development of maize (Zea mays L.) in response to different levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and irrigation. Crop Research-Hisar-22(2), 141-149.

    Iden, N.U.A (1989). Effect of nitrogen rate and time of application on yield and yield components of maize in the Northern Guinea Savanna Zone of Nigeria. Paper presented at SAFGRAD Workshop, Home-Togo.

    Mani, H., Ado, S. G., Hussaini, M. A., Adamu, R., & Marley, P.S. (2002). Effect of variety and sowing date of early maturing maize. In 2001/2002 Cropping Scheme Meeting Report on Cereals Research Programme, Institute for Agricultural Research Samaru. 72 - 73pp

    Mani, H. (2004). Growth and yield performance of two Popcorn (Zea mays everta) varieties to rates of NPK fertilizer under different irrigation intervals. Unpublished PhD dissertation, submitted to Postgraduate School Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. Pp 167.

    Muchow, R. C., & Sinclair, T. R. (2014). Nitrogen responses of leaf photosynthesis and canopy radiation use efficiency in field grown maize and sorghum. Crop Sci. 34, 721 - 727.

    Iken, J. E. Amusa, N. A., & Obatolu, V. O. (2002). “Nutrient composition and weight evaluation of some newly developed maize varieties in Nigeria, Journal of Food Technology in Africa, 7(1), 25 – 28.

    Jones, M. J. (2013). Time of application of Nitrogen Fertilizer in maize in Samaru, Nigeria. Exp. Agric., 9, 113 - 120.

    Kogbe, J. O. S., & Adediran, J. A. (2013). Influence of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium application on the yield of maize in the savanna zone of Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2(10), 345 – 349.

    Lemcoff., J. H., & Loomis, R. S. (2010). Nitrogen influences on yield determination on maize. Crop Sci., 26, 1017 - 1022.

    Lucas, E. O. (2016). The growth of two maize varieties in farmers’ plots located at two contiguous ecological zones in Nigeria. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge, 97, 125 - 134. 

    Marti, H. R. & Mills, H. A. (2011). Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Sweet Pepper as Affected by Stage of Development and N Form. J. Plant Nutr., 14(11), 1165 – 1175.

    Namakka, A. (2002). Effect of sowing date and nitrogen levels on yield and yield components of extra-early maize (Zea may L.) in Sudan savannah of Nigeria. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis submitted to School of Postgraduate studies, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, pp 89.

    Namakka, A., Abubakar, I.U., Sadiq, I.A., Sherifai, A.I., Hassan, A.H. & Hussaini, Y. (2009). Effects of varying sowing date and nitrogen levels on growth of two extra-early Maize (Zea mays L.) varieties in Sudan Savannah of Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Research and Policies, 1(1), 30 - 34.

    Olaniyan A. B. (2011). Effects of progressive reduction of density and nitrogen fertilizer on the performance of maize genotypes in south western Nigeria. PhD Thesis. University of Ibadan. 217pp.

    Olowoboko, T. B., Onasanya, O. O., Salami, O. T., & Azeez, J. O. (2017). Growth and Uptake in Maize as Influenced by NPK Fertilizer in Green House Experiment. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 17(3), 1 - 10.

    Ranum, P., Peña-Rosas, J. P., & Garcia-Casal. (2014). “Global Maize Production, Utilization, and Consumption.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1312(1), 105 – 112.

    Schnable, P. S., Ware, D., Fulton, R. S et al. (2012). The B73 Maize Genome: Complexity, Diversity and Dynamics. Science, 326, 1112 – 1115.

    Shah, H. A., Fareed, M. K., Dilnawaz, A., & Mubasher, S. (2005). Comparative studies of mountain maize (Zea mays L.) ecotypes in Kotli District, Azad Kashimir. Pakistan. International Journal Biodiversity Science Management, 1, 129 - 133.

    Shanti, K. V. P., Rao, M. R., Reddy, M. S., & Sarma, R. S. (2017). Response of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrid and composite to different levels of nitrogen. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 67, 424 - 425.

    Snedecor, G. W & Cochran, N. G. (1967). Statistical methods sixth edition Iowa State University press, pp. 607.

    Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2010). Plant Physiology, 5th Edition. Sinauer Associates Publishers, Sunderland, MA.

    Wajid, A., Ghaffar, A., Maqsood, M., Gussain, K., &  Nasim, W. (2007). Yield response of maize hybrid to varying nitrogen rates. Pakistani Journal of Agriculture Science, 44(2), 217 - 220.