Journal of Innovative Agriculture, Volume 9, Issue 2 : 28-41 . Doi : 10.37446/jinagri/rsa/9.2.2022.28-41
Research Article
OPEN ACCESS | Published on : 30-Jun-2022

Performance evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) varieties for growth and yield as influenced by Urea and NPK fertilizers


  • Musa Umar Tanko
  • Department of Crop Production, Prince Abubakar Audu University, PMB 1008 Anyigba, Kogi State, Nigeria.

  • Yusuf Momohjimoh
  • Department of Agricultural Technology, Kogi State Polytechnic, PMB 1101 Lokoja, Kogi State, Nigeria.

Abstract

This field experiment was conducted during the 2021 cropping season at the Prince Abubakar Audu University Research and Demonstration farm, Anyigba in the Southern Guinea Savana Agro Ecological Zone of Nigeria to determine the performance of maize varieties under the influence of NPK 20:10:10 and Urea fertilizer application. A Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) was used with three replications. The treatment consisted of three NPK 20:10:10 levels (0, 60, 120), Urea (0, 60, 120) and two varieties [Samaz 52 (OPV) and Oba-super-6 (Hybrid)] respectively. Results obtained show that fertilizers application increased growth parameters such as; plant height, days to 1st and 50% flowering. However, Number of leaves/plant, number of spikes/plant and grain weight/cob was not significantly influenced by fertilizer application. There were varietal differences in number of spikes/tassel and threshing %. Oba-super-6 consistently produced taller plants, thicker stems, higher leaf area, more spike/tassels than OPV. Application of NPK 20:10:10 fertilizer at 120kg/ha significantly influence yield and some yield components such as cob length (13.84cm), threshing % (78.61) and final grain yield (4196.30kg/ha), number of grains/cob (355.85), leaf area at 4 and 6WAS (307.21 and 447.28cm) respectively than at the application of 60kg/ha and 0kg/ha. However, application of 120kg N/ha significantly influenced 100-seed weight (29.36). Oba-super-6 out yielded OPV in yield and its components. For the interactions studied, for days to emergence, all factors studied had no significant effect (P ≥ 0.05); for plant height, NPK x V, NPK x N, N x V was significant (P ≤ 0.05), for days to 1st, NPK x N and NPK x N x V was significant (P ≤ 0.05), for days to 50% flowering, NPK x V, N x V and NPK x N x V was significant (P ≤ 0.05). for threshing percent, only NPK x N was significant (P ≤ 0.05); for No. of grains/cob, NPK x N and NPK x N x V was significant (P ≤ 0.05); for 100-seed weight, all factors studied had no significant effect (P ≥ 0.05); for final grain weight, NPK x N and NPK x N x V was significant.

Keywords

urea, threshing percent, Days to emergence, Final Grain weight, 100-seed weight, variety and interaction, maize

References

  • Adediran, J. A., & Banjoko, V. A. (1995). Response of maize to nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers in the savanna zones of Nigeria. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis26(3-4), 593-606.

    Agba, T. S., & Long, H. S. (2005). Nitrogen effects on maize foliage and grain yield. Nigerian Agricultural Journal3, 74-80.

    Agbede, T. M., Adekiya, A. O., Ale, M. O., Eifediyi, E. K., & Olatunji, C. A. (2019). Effects of green manures and NPK fertilizer on soil properties, tomato yield and quality in the forest-savanna ecology of Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture55(5), 793-806.

    Ahmadu, I. A. (2014). Performance of extra-early maize (Zea mays L.) varieties as influenced by rate of nitrogen and intra-row spacing (Doctoral dissertation).

    Akintoye, H. A., Kling, J. G., & Lucas, E. O. (1999). N-use efficiency of single, double and synthetic maize lines grown at four N levels in three ecological zones of West Africa. Field Crops Research, 60(3), 189-199.

    Ayub, M., Nadeem, M. A., Sharar, M. S., & Mahmood, N. (2002). Response of maize (Zea mays L.) fodder to different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences1(4), 352-354.

    Baba, I. S. C. (2002). Effect of plant density and rate of NPK fertilizer on the performance of popcorn (Zea mays L.). Unpublished B. Agric Poject, submitted to Department of Agronomy, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. 48pp.

    Bashir, N., Malik, S. A., Mahmood, S., Athar, H. U. R., & Athar, M. (2012). Influence of urea application on growth, yield and mineral uptake in two corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology11(46), 10494-10503.

    Doebley, J. (2004). The genetics of maize evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet.38(1), 37-59.

    FAOSTAT. (2011). Production—Crops 2010 data. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2014). FAO production yearbook. FAO.

    Gallais, A., & Hirel, B. (2004). An approach to the genetics of nitrogen use efficiency in maize. Journal of experimental botany, 55(396), 295-306.

    Hussaini, M. A., Ogunlela, V. B., Ramalan, A. A., & Falaki, A. M. (2001). Growth and development of maize (Zea mays L.) in response to different levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and irrigation. Crop Research (Hisar), 22(2), 141–149.

    Iken, J. E. Amusa, N. A., & Obatolu, V. O. (2002). Nutrient composition and weight evaluation of some newly developed maize varieties in Nigeria, Journal of Food Technology in Africa, 7(1), 27-29.

    Jones, M. J. (1973). Time of application of nitrogen fertilizer to maize at Samaru, Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture9(2), 113-120.

    Kogbe, J. O. S., & Adediran, J. A. (2013). Influence of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium application on the yield of maize in the savanna zone of Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2(10), 345 – 349.

    Lemcoff, J. H., & Loomis, R. S. (1986). Nitrogen influences on yield determination in maize 1. Crop Science26(5), 1017-1022.

    Lucas, E. O. (1981). The growth of two maize varieties in farmers' plots located at two contiguous ecological zones in Nigeria. The Journal of Agricultural Science97(1), 125-134.

    Mani, H. (2004). Growth and yield performance of two popcorn (Zea mays everta) varieties to rates of NPK fertilizer under different irrigation intervals. D Thesis, Department of Agronomy, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, 98-99.

    Mani, H., Ado, S. G., Hussaini, M. A., Shebayan, J. A. Y., Adamu, R., & Marley, P. S. (2002). Effect of variety and sowing date of early maturing maize. In 2001/2002 cropping scheme meeting report on cereals research programme (pp. 72–73). I. A. R. Samaru.

    Marti, H. R., & Mills, H. A. (1991). Nutrient uptake and yield of sweet pepper as affected by stage of development and N form. Journal of plant nutrition14(11), 1165-1175.

    Muchow, R. C., & Sinclair, T. R. (1994). Nitrogen response of leaf photosynthesis and canopy radiation use efficiency in field‐grown maize and sorghum. Crop Science34(3), 721-727.

    Namakka, A. (2002). Effect of sowing date and nitrogen levels on yield and yield components of extra-early maize (Zea mays L.) in Sudan Savanna of Nigeria. Unpublished M. Sc. Thesis submitted to Postgraduate School Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria 89pp.

    Namakka, A., Abubakar, I.U., Sadiq, I.A., Sherifai, A.I., Hassan, A.H. & Hussaini, Y. (2009). Effects of varying sowing date and nitrogen levels on growth of two extra-early Maize (Zea mays L.) varieties in Sudan Savannah of Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Research and Policies, 1(1), 30 - 34.

    Olaniyan, A. B. (2011). Effects of progressive reduction of density and nitrogen fertilizer on the performance of maize genotypes in south western Nigeria (Doctoral dissertation, University of Ibadan).

    Olowoboko, T. B., Onasanya, O. O., Salami, O. T., & Azeez, J. O. (2017). Growth and Uptake in Maize as Influenced by NPK Fertilizer in Green House Experiment. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 17(3), 1 - 10.

    Ranum, P., Peña‐Rosas, J. P., & Garcia‐Casal, M. N. (2014). Global maize production, utilization, and consumption. Annals of the new York academy of sciences1312(1), 105-112.

    Schnable, P. S., Ware, D., Fulton, R. S., Stein, J. C., Wei, F., Pasternak, S., ... & Presting, G. G. (2009). The B73 maize genome: Complexity, Diversity, and  Dynamics. Science, 326(5956), 1112-1115.

    Shah, A. H., Khan, M. F., Ahmad, D., & Sabir, M. (2005). Comparative studies of mountain maize (Zea mays L.) ecotypes in Kotli District, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. The International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management1(2), 129-133.

    Shanti, K., RAO, V. P., REDDY, M. R., REDDY, M. S., & Sarma, P. S. (1997). Response of maize (Zen mays) hybrid and composite to different levels of nitrogen. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences67(9), 424–425.

    Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical methods (6th ed.). The Iowa State University Press.

    Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2010). Responses and adaptations to abiotic stress. Plant Physiology, Fifth Edition. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc, 755-778.

    Wajid, A., Ghaffar, A., Maqsood, M., Gussain, K., &  Nasim, W. (2007). Yield response of maize hybrid to varying nitrogen rates. Pakistani Journal of Agriculture Science, 44(2), 217 - 220.