Journal of Innovative Agriculture, Volume 1, Issue 1 : 7-15. Doi : 10.37446/jinagri/1.1.2014.7-15
Research Article

OPEN ACCESS | Published on : 30-Dec-2014

Zeolite-based slow release nanoformulation influencing soil fertility

  • P Selva Preetha
  • Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Directorate of Natural Resource Management, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641003.
  • K S Subramanian
  • Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Directorate of Natural Resource Management, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641003.


A pot culture experiment was conducted to assess the relative performance of fertilizer composites developed using conventional fertilizers and zeolite based nano formulations in the recommended proportions of N, P, K, S, Zn, B and Mo using greengram as test crop. The plants were fertilized with 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 % of the conventional or nano-fertilizer formulations. Before fortification the Zeolite were subjected to size reduction and modified by using hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, a cationic surfactant, to modify its surface to increase its capacity to retain anions. During the experiment soil samples were collected and assessed for its nutrient status besides biochemical properties and microbial population. The result shows that the physical and chemical properties of conventional fertilizer applied and nano-fertilizer formulation applied soils were significantly differs in terms of bulk density, particle density, porosity, pH, EC and CEC. The biochemical properties such as water soluble carbon and biomass carbon then biological properties like microbial populations in soils are measured in end of the experiment shows the significant response to added conventional or nano-fertilizer. Pot culture study also confirms that the soil available nutrients responded well for nano-zeolite. Higher biological activities in nano-fertilizer fertilized soil reached within 25 or 50% of the nanofertilizer in comparison to conventional fertilizer.


Nano-fertilizer, Soil fertility, Zeolite, Fortification


  • Andronikashvili, T., Urushadze, T., Eprikashvili, L. and Gamisonia, M. 2008. Towards the  biological activity of the natural zeolite – clinoptilolite-   containing tuff. Bull. Georg. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2: 65-68.

    Breck, D.W. 1974. Zeolite Molecular SieVes; John   Wiley   & Sons: New York.

    Broos, K., Warne, J., Heemsbergen, D.A., Stevens, D., Barnes, M.B., Correll, R.L. and    Mclaughlin, M.J. 2007. Soil factors controlling the toxicity of copper and zinc to microbial processes in Australian Soils. Environ. Toxi. Chem., 26(4): 583–590.

    Faghihian, H. and Bowman, R.S. 2005. Adsorption of chromate by clinoptilolite exchanged with various metal cations. Water Res., 39: 1099-   1104.

    Guptha, R.P. and Dhakshinamurthi, C. 1980. Procedures for Physical analysis of soils and collection of Agrometerological Data division of agricultural physics. IARI, New Delhi.

    Haggerty, M.G. and Bowman, S.R. 1994. Sorptsion of chromate and other inorganic anions by organo-zeolite. Environ. Sci. Techn., 28: 452–458.

    He, Z.L., Calvert, D.V., Alva, A.K., Li, Y.C. and     Banks, D.J. 2002. Clinoptilolite zeolite and cellulose amendments to reduce ammonia volatilization in a calcareous sandy soil. Plant Soil., 247: 253-260.

    Huang, Z.T. and Petrovic, A.M. 1994. Clinoptilolite zeolite influence on nitrate leaching and nitrogen use efficiency in simulated sand based golf greens. J. Environ. Qual., 23: 1190-1194.

    Jackson, M. 1973. Soil chemical Analysis. Pentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India.

    Jenkinson, D.S and Powlson. 1976. The effects of biocidal treatments in metabolism in soil. The decomposition of fumigated organisms in soil. Soil Biol. Bio-Chem., 8: 209-213.

    Li, J., Zhang, R. and Zhen, L. 2005. Effect of phosphorus on plant growth and phosphorus uptake and use efficiency in different soybean cultivars. Plant Nutri. Fert. Sci., 3(4): 22-23.

    Liu, M., Liang, R., Liu, F. and Niu, A. 2006. Synthesis  of a slow release and superabsorbent nitrogen fertilizer and its properties. Polym. Adv. Tech.,17: 430-438.

    Markus Puschenreiter and Othmar Horak. 2003. Slow-release zeolite-bound zinc and copper fertilizers affect cadmium concentration in wheat and spinach. Communications in Soil Sci. Pl. Analysis., 34(2): 31–40.

    Mazur, G.A., Medvid, G.K. and Gvigora, I.T. 1986. Use of natural zeolite to increase the fertilizer of coarse soils. Soviet Soil Sci., 16(4): 105-         111.

    McGill, W.B., Shield, J.A. and Poul, E.A. 1975. Relation between carbon and nitrogen turnover in soil organic fractions of microbial origin. Soil Boil.Biochem., 15: 251-256.

    Milosevic, T. and Milosevic, N. 2009. The effect of zeolite, organic and inorganic fertilizers on apple trees' soil chemical properties, growth and biomass yield. Plant Soil Environ., 55: 528–535.

    Ming, D.W. and Boettinger, J.L. 2001. Zeolites in soil environments. In: Natural Zeolites: Occurrence, Properties, Applications (eds Bish, D.L. and Ming, D.W.). Rev. Mineral  Geochem., 45: 323–345.

    Mühlbachová, G. and Šimon, T. 2003. Effects of zeolite amendment on microbial biomass and respiratory activity in heavy metal contaminated soils. Plant Soil Environ., 49:   536–541.

    Navrotsky, A. 2004. Environmental nanoparticles. In:  Dekker Encyclopedia of Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2: 1147-1156.

    Noori, M., Zendehdel, M. and Ahmadi, A. 2006. Using natural zeolite for the improvement of soil salinity and crop yield. Toxicol. Environ. Chem., 88: 77-84.

    Notario del Pino, J.S., Arteaga Padron, I.J.,   Gonzalez Martin, M.M. and Garcia    Hernandez, J.E. 1994. Response of alfalfa to a phillipsite-based slow-release fertilizer. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 25: 2231–      2245.

    Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.L., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean,   D.A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA, Circ, 939p.

    Paramananthan. S. 2000. Soils of Malaysia: Their characteristics and Identification. Academy of Science Malaysia, Malaysia., 1: 55-62.

    Piper, C.S. 1966. Soil and Plant analysis. Hans Publishers, Bombay.

    Shetal, A.S., Falatah, A.M., Al-Sewailem, M.S.,  Khaled, E.M. and Sallam, A.S.H. 2003. Sorption characteristics of zinc and iron by natural zeolite and bentonite. Microporous and Mesoporous Mat., 61: 127–136.

    Stanford, S. and English, L. 1949. A use of Flame Photometer in rapid soil tests of K and Ca.    Agron. J., 41: 446-447.

    Stead, K., Oukil, S.K. and Ward, N.I. 2010. Natural zeolites - remediation technology for the 21st century?. Bioresource Tech., 72: 113-119.

    Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. 1956. A rapid procedures for estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current Sci., 25: 259-260.

    Subramanian, K.S. and Rahale, S. 2009. Synthesis of nanofertiliser formulations for balanced nutrition. Proceedings of the Indian society of soil science-platinum Jubilee celebration. IARI, Campus, New Delhi. 85p.

    Vestberg. M. and Kukkonen, S. 2008. Performance of AM fungi in peat substrates in greenhouse and field studies. COST 870 Meeting “From production to application of arbuscular  mycorrhizal fungi in agricultural systems: a        multidisciplinary approach”, Denmark.

    Vosatka, M. and Gryndler, M. 2000. Response of  micropropagated potatoes transplanted to peat media to post-vitro inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil bacteria. Appl. Soil Ecol., 15: 145-152.

    Yang, S., Navrotsky, A. and Wilkin, R. 2001. Thermodynamics of ionexchanged and natural clinoptilolite. Am. Mineral., 86: 438–             447.